Now, talking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that is normally used for even ten per cent of its possible.
What's it to get the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of thickness would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", if the person has fastened his wrist to the maximum after a dip and a few strokes, return immediately to lounge under the umbrella?
If that is their principal use, it's merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the introduction of the so-called divers of the modern era that dates back to the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible desire to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, one of the most iconic timepieces that the category can boast, was already tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of the well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famed documentary -movie additionally winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well among the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist thanks to his fabric strap became a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other without the crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everyone.
These are just two of the first cases that reveal - fiction or fact - for more than fifty years, the press - driven by the watch sector - determined the diver watches ought to be the very first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Maybe it's also from this day the manufacturers in regards to describing their versions started to use the term: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 shift, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose role has been played by the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their real use within this massive family whose roots would simply deal with "hard greater than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to dread even once you need to wash the palms.
But a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let's just mention the characteristics and constructive philosophies of these fascinating references.
I have a long-standing friend who is a professional diver and who, during his diving at the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - including that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to guarantee the following performances:
Excellent visibility throughout the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the system that reports that the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its movement, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests did not end here: today professional diving watches must adhere to specific rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
To get best dive watches under 500 a common mortal usage, that which we know is the best, the best sub may be ultimately a watchable to provide features much milder and easier to manage.
I remember that in order to only immerse the surface at maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that is not website so when it is done a banal swim in the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely on a screw-on crown, better still if protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
Along with the security on the watertight status of this submerged timepieces?
Just for people who would never use them for professional purposes the ideal would be to be able to rely upon a system that visually signals about the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, and the watch is therefore in a blatant condition of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dive watch might have to be hurried into a service centre, prior to seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism forever. This function already exists, but on hardly any versions, which honestly I do not understand why.
You may have worn your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to go to the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have left to twist the crown tightly. It is the most common case.
Suggestion - When you have worn the costume decide on the fly : either leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily create a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen a little 'of problems related to the time that must satisfy with the water, and also given the essential advice, I show you which - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I've divided them into two classes. The sequence in which they appear doesn't signify any ranking.